Environmental Education in Thai High Schools: The Insights into Learning Objectives and Pedagogical Approaches
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
Environmental Education (EE) has been recognized by the United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) as a vital component in fostering environmentally literate citizens and promoting global
sustainability. However, despite its acknowledged importance, there is limited understanding of how high
school teachers integrate EE into authentic learning environments. Existing literature on environmentally EE
has predominantly concentrated on interventions and their effects on environmental knowledge, proenvironmental
behaviors, and related outcomes. This study employed simple random sampling to select
42 teachers from 22 secondary schools regarding their learning objectives and pedagogical approaches in EE.
The respondents were selected from three groups of teachers: 1) biological or environmental science
teachers, 2) social studies or civic education teachers, and 3) advisors for assemblies or extracurricular
activities related to EE or sustainable development. The data were systematically analyzed by calculating
the frequency and percentage distributions of the respondents’ selections, as well as identifying the key
learning objectives and pedagogical approaches utilized by the teachers. The findings indicated that the
primary goals of EE were the application of knowledge, the cultivation of environmental values, and the
acquisition of environmental knowledge. The most commonly employed pedagogical approaches included
traditional lectures, inquiry-based learning, and problem-based learning. Conversely, less frequently adopted
approaches encompassed place-based learning, emancipatory approach, and action project learning. The
study further revealed that classroom-based EE tended to prioritize knowledge acquisition and its practical
application, rather than fostering students’ ability to initiate environmental change through collaboration
with relevant stakeholders. These findings highlight the necessity for expanding the repertoire of pedagogical
approaches in EE and advocate for a shift towards more proactive, capacity-building approaches that
encourage collaborative networks. Such an approach would empower students to actively engage in
addressing environmental challenges.
Article Details

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความนี้ได้รับการเผยแพร่ภายใต้สัญญาอนุญาต Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ซึ่งอนุญาตให้ผู้อื่นสามารถแชร์บทความได้โดยให้เครดิตผู้เขียนและห้ามนำไปใช้เพื่อการค้าหรือดัดแปลง หากต้องการใช้งานซ้ำในลักษณะอื่น ๆ หรือการเผยแพร่ซ้ำ จำเป็นต้องได้รับอนุญาตจากวารสารเอกสารอ้างอิง
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation:
A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224.
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., Roth, N. W., & Holthuis, N. (2018). Environmental education and K-12
student outcomes: A review and analysis of research. The Journal of Environmental Education,
(1), 1-17.
Blythe, C., & Harré, N. (2020). Encouraging transformation and action competence: A theory of change
evaluation of a sustainability leadership program for high school students. The Journal of
Environmental Education, 51(1), 83-96.
Chen, S.-Y., & Liu, S.-Y. (2020). Developing students’ action competence for a sustainable future: A
review of educational research. Sustainability, 12(1374). doi:10.3390/su12041374
Cincera, J., Simonova, P., Kroufek, R., & Johnson, B. (2020). Empowerment in outdoor environmental
education: Who shapes the programs? Environmental Education Research, 26(12), 1690-1706.
Corpuz, A. M., San Andres, T. C., & Lagasca, J. M. (2022). Integration of environmental education (EE) in
teacher education programs: Toward sustainable curriculum greening. Problems of Education
in the 21st Century, 80(1), 119-143.
Department of Climate Change and Environment (DCCE). (2024). Eco-School Guideline. DCCE, Ministry
of Natural Resources and Environment.
Division of Environmental Education. (2019). Eco-School. Retrieved from https://ecoschool.dcce.go.th/
Earth5R. (2024). Importance of Environmental Education in Thailand. Retrieved from
https://earth5r.org/environmental-education-thailand/
Edgeman, R. (2020). Urgent evolution: Excellence and wicked Anthropocene age challenges. Total
Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(5-6), 469-482.
Environment and Pollution Control Office 14. (2023). Thailand State of Pollution Report 2023. Retrieved
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science
basis. Summary for policymakers.
Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental
education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163-178.
Jorgenson, S. N., Stephens, J. C., & White, B. (2019). Environmental education in transition: A critical
review of recent research on climate change and energy education. The Journal of
Environmental Education, 50(3), 160-171.
Jose, S., Patrick, P. G., & Moseley, C. (2017). Experiential learning theory: The importance of outdoor
classrooms in environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B,
(3), 269-284.
Ketsing, J. (2023). Environmental Education for Cultivating Change Agent. Charansanitwong Printing Co.,
Ltd.
Ketsing, J., Ketchanok, S., & Channakorn, S. (2023). Action competence for environment: New
perspective of learning outcome in environmental education. Journal of Education, Prince of
Songkla University, Pattani Campus, 34(1), 1-19.
Kirsop-Taylor, N., Appiah, D., Steadman, A., & Huggett, M. (2021). Reflections on integrating the political
into environmental education through problem-based learning and political ecology. The
Journal of Environmental Education, 52(1), 1-13.
Kricsfalusy, V., George, C., & Reed, M. G. (2018). Integrating problem- and project-based learning
opportunities: Assessing outcomes of a field course in environment and
sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 593-610.
Kyburz-Graber, R. (2019). 50 years of environmental research from a European perspective. The Journal
of Environmental Education, 50(4-6), 378-385.
Lechner, A. M., Li Ern Ang, M. Ooi, J-Y, Azhar, B., J. Miguel Kanai, J. M., Hamel, P., & Sagala, S. (2021).
Urban biodiversity and nature-based solutions in southeast Asia: Perspectives from Indonesia
and Malaysia. 30 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119614: ISEAS Publishing.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2010). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008). MOE.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2017). Learning Standards and Indicators of Mathematics, Science and
Geography in the Subject Matter of Social Studies, Religion and Culture (Revised version B.E.
according to the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551. MOE.
North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE). (2010). Guidelines for Excellence K-
Learning. NAAEE Publications and Membership Office.
Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Olsson, D., Gericke, N., Maeyer, S. D., & Van Petegem, P. (2020). Redefining
action competence: The case of sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental
Education, 51(4), 292-305.
Sompong, P., & Jantrasee, R. (2023). The effect of socio-scientific inquiry-based learning of life in the
environment on grade 10th students’ asking questions. Journal of Inclusive and Innovative
Education, 7(2), 134-148.
Thomas, R. E. W., Teel, T., Bruyere, B., & Laurence, S. (2019). Metrics and outcomes of conservation
education: A quarter century of lessons learned. Environmental Education Research, 25(2),
-192.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1978). Final Report,
Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Organized by UNESCO in
Cooperation with UNEP, Tbilisi, USSR, 14–26 October 1977. UNESCO.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2016). Education for people
and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all, Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO.
Wahyudin, D., & Malik, R. S. (2019). Teaching environmental education for sustainable development:
Strategies and challenges. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 3(1),
-70.
Wals, A. E. J., & Benavot, A. (2017). Can we meet the sustainability challenges? The role of education
and lifelong learning. European Journal of Education: Research, Development and Policy,
(4), 404-413.
Wangrittikrikul, K., Thepwilai, S., Chaochai, S., & Bissen, R. (2 0 2 0 ) . Microplastics in beach sediments of
Thailand. Thai Environment, 4(25), 1-9.
Washington, H., Bron, T., Kopnina, H., Cryer, P., & Piccolo, J. J. (2017). Why ecocentrism is the key
pathway to sustainability. Ecological Citizen, 1(1), 32-41.
Wu, M., Zhu, Z., Chen, J., Niu, L., & Liu, C.-C. (2020). Autobiographical memory functions: An
emancipatory approach to construct environmental education outcomes. Environmental
Education Research, 26(5), 632-649.
WWF-Thailand. (2018). WWF-Thailand Announces Eco-Schools 2018. Retrieved from
https://www.ecoschools.global/thailand-eco-schools-2018
Zhan, Y., He, R., & Wing Mui So, W. (2019). Developing elementary school children’s water conservation
action competence: A case study in China. International Journal of Early Years Education,
(3), 287-305.