An Analytical Study of Experiential Buddhist Principles
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) analyze experiential Buddhist principles in the dimensions of epistemology, metaphysics, and ethics; 2) examine the relationship between experiential Buddhist principles, experiential learning, and postmodern philosophy; and 3) synthesize a conceptual framework concerning Buddhist learning through direct experience. The study employed a qualitative documentary research methodology using Buddhist scriptures, the Tripitaka, and related academic literature. Data were analyzed through content analysis and philosophical interpretation within epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical frameworks. The findings revealed that experiential Buddhist principles emphasize the realization of truth through direct personal experience, self-observation, reflective contemplation, and practical application, leading to wisdom beyond theoretical understanding. In the epistemological dimension, knowledge is regarded as arising from practice and direct realization. In the metaphysical dimension, truth is viewed as dynamic and dependent upon conditions and contexts. In the ethical dimension, experiential Buddhism promotes balanced living and compassionate coexistence with others. Furthermore, the study found that experiential Buddhist principles are inherently dynamic and correspond with experiential learning theories and postmodern philosophy, which view truth as contextual and interpretative rather than absolute. The research synthesized a new conceptual framework called the “EBL Model” (Experiential Buddhist Learning Model), consisting of four major processes: direct experience, self-observation, reflective wisdom, and practical transformation.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
พระกัมพล กมฺพโล (สายอาภรณ์) และคณะ. (2563). การศึกษาวิเคราะห์คุณค่าและความสำคัญของมัชฌิมาปฏิปทาในธัมมจักกัปปวัตนสูตร. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 5(5), 248-259.
พระธรรมปิฎก (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2546). พุทธธรรม ฉบับปรับปรุงและขยายความ. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 10. กรุงเทพฯ: สหธรรมิก.
พระธรรมปิฎก (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2546). สลายความขัดแย้ง. กรุงเทพฯ: สหธรรมิก.
มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2539). พระไตรปิฎกภาษาไทย ฉบับมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. กรุงเทพฯ: มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.
Analayo, B. (2012). Satipatthana: The direct path to realization. Birmingham: Windhorse Publications.
Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University Press.
Dechakupt, P., & Yindeesuk, P. (2014). Learning management for intellectual development. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, P. (2013). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lyotard, J.F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rahula, W. (1974). What the Buddha taught. New York: Grove Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
