Decision making on Student Affairs Administration by Educational Personnel under the Chonburi Primary Educational Service Area Office 2 Province

Abstract

            The purposes of this research were 1) To study the decision-making level 2) To study the level of student affairs administration work 3) To study the relationship between decision-making and student affairs administration work of educational personnel, Chonburi Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. The sample group used in this research was 385 educational personnel using Tarro Yamane's sample size table. The tool used was a statistical questionnaire used in data analysis: Frequency breakdown Finding percentages, averages, standard deviations and Pearson's Product Moment Correlation Coefficient analysis.

            The results of the study found that:- 1) Overall decision making is at a high level. When considering each aspect, it was found that number 1 was the problem determination aspect, followed by the search for alternatives aspect. Aspects of evaluating alternatives Decision making Decision implementation and the last ranking is in terms of evaluating results and providing feedback, respectively. 2) Student affairs administration Overall, the average level is at a high level. When considering each aspect, it was found that number 1 was student affairs administration, followed by student support system operations. In terms of promoting and developing students to have discipline, morality, and ethics, in evaluating the performance of student affairs. And the last ranking is Promoting democracy in schools, respectively. The relationship between the relationship between decision-making and student affairs administration work of educational personnel in the Chonburi Primary Educational Service Area Office, Area 2 using the multiple regression method found that the problem determination aspect Search for alternatives Aspects of evaluating alternate Feedback and student affairs According to the new order of magnitude, the multiple correlation coefficient (R) is equal to 0.910.tives Decision making Decision implement and can explain the variation in decision-making with student affairs administration work by educational personnel in the Chonburi Primary Educational Service Area Office, Area 2, with statistical significance at the 0.01 level, 82.80 percent (R2=0.828). Action Aspects of evaluating results and the test results of the student affairs hypothesis have a positive impact on student affairs administration. All assumptions are consistent. Statistically significant at the 0.01 level.