ASSESSMENT OF THARAI YOUTH UNITE AGAINST DRUGS PROJECT OF THARAI SUBDISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION NAKHON SI THAMMARAT

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate Tharai Youth unite against drugs project of Tharai subdistrict administrative organization Nakhon Si Thammarat with the CIPP assessment model in 4 aspects: context, input, process, and product. The data was collected from 113 participants consisting of 102 students, 8 teachers, and 3 administrators. The instruments used to collect data were 3 questionnaires. The data was analyzed by using SPSS Program. The statistics were percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The research results were as follows: 1. Context evaluation based on the opinion of the administrators and teachers as a whole was at a high level. The item with the highest mean score was the consistency of principles and rationale of Tharai Youth unite against drugs project with the vision of Tharai subdistrict administrative organization, and the lowest mean score was the consistency of the principles and rationale of the project with the goals of Tharai Sub-District Administrative Organization. 2. Input, it was found that the opinions of the administrators and teachers as a whole were at a high level. The highest mean was the appropriate and adequate personnel organizing the project, and the period of implementing the activities according to the project was suitable.  The least mean score was the suitability of the building and the place to do activity. 3)  Process, the opinions of the administrators as a whole were at a high level. The highest mean score was the appointment of the project responsible committee with the qualifications, and the clarity of the coordination of the project responsible people. The clarity of setting process to organize Tharai Youth unite against drugs project and the clarification meeting with teachers, responsible people and those involved to make understanding the step and operate process was at the lowest level.  4) Product, it was found that feedback of students was at a high level. The highest mean score was the students learned how to treat themselves and knew the Addiction Treatment Center. The public mind and cooperation in doing activity with school and community of students was at the lowest level.