DEVELOPMENT OF A CONNECTIVSIM-BASED TRAINING COURSE TO ENHANCE ENGLISH COMMUNICATIVE TEACHING SKILLS THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING AND ENGLISH AS AN INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE FOR ENGLISH MAJOR STUDENT TEACHERS AT RAJABHAT UNIVERSITIES

Main Article Content

Kollawat Kasemchok
Henry Yuh Anchunda

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) study the components of English communicative teaching skills integrating Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and English as an International Language (EIL), 2) develop a training course, 3) study the effectiveness, and 4) study the satisfaction of the training course, using research and development methods with four steps: Step 1: the components of English communicative teaching skills, and so on were explored. Data were collecting through interviews with five experts and a literature review. Step 2: the connectivism-based training course was developed and assessed for appropriateness by five purposively selected experts. The data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation. Step 3: the training course was implemented to study its effectiveness. The sample comprised 52 English major student teachers at Rajabhat University, using purposive sampling. The research instrument was an assessment form, and the data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation. Step 4: the satisfaction and opinions were studied using a questionnaire and in-depth interviews. The data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and content analysis.


The results revealed that: 1) The components of English communicative teaching skills consisted of (1) lesson plan design, (2) using of communicative activities, (3) EIL awareness, (4) using of authentic materials, and (5) communicative assessment competence. 2) The course comprised four stages: (1) Preparation and Motivation, (2) Exploration and Connection, (3) Collaboration and Creation, and (4) Reflection and Evaluation. The training course appropriateness was at a high level. 3) The implementation results showed that student teachers had significantly higher communicative teaching skills with a mean score of 82.80, passing the 70% criterion. And 4) The student teachers reported high levels of satisfaction.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kasemchok, K., & Anchunda, H. Y. (2026). DEVELOPMENT OF A CONNECTIVSIM-BASED TRAINING COURSE TO ENHANCE ENGLISH COMMUNICATIVE TEACHING SKILLS THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING AND ENGLISH AS AN INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE FOR ENGLISH MAJOR STUDENT TEACHERS AT RAJABHAT UNIVERSITIES. Educational Administration and Innovation Journal, 6(2), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.2822.EAI202626348
Section
Research Articles

References

Abdelmageed, N. A. T., & Omer, M. A. A. (2020). The effectiveness of using communicative language teaching approach (CLT) in developing students’ speaking skills from teachers’ perceptions. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(3), 88 – 102

Adityarini, H. (2007). English as an international language (EIL) and implication for English language teaching, 19(2), 103 - 111.

Alamri, W. A. (2018). Communicative language teaching: Possible alternative approaches to CLT and teaching contexts. English Language Teaching, 11(10), 132 - 138.

Azizova, M. M., & Gapparova, A. N. (2021). The effective methods and principles of communicative language teaching. Academic research in educational sciences, 2(CSPI conference 1), 601 - 605.

Baker, W., & Jarunthawatchai, W. (2017). English language policy in Thailand. European Journal of Language Policy, 9(1), 27 – 44.

Borna, M., & Fouladchang, M. (2018). The Motivational outcomes of connectivism theory in EFL. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM), 8(2), 103 - 116.

Cao, L. Y. (2018). Study on college English teaching interaction and teaching Practice based on connectivism from the neurocognitive perspective. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5), 2338 - 2346.

Chuenchaikit, T., Kiddee, K., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2022). Development of a Training Course: A needs assessment approach to enhance the facilitator technique for Thai community enterprises. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 10(3), 406 - 415.

Daar, G. F. (2022). Analysis the implementation of communicative language teaching and classroom interaction in the effort to increase learners’ speaking skills. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(12), 969 - 978.

Djamolovna, N., & Gopalan, V. (2024). A review of curriculum development models influencing collaborative learning in education. The American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 7(6), 70 - 77.

Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2021). English medium instruction and the English language practitioner. ELT Journal, 75(1), 33 – 41.

Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age?. Medical teacher, 38(10), 1064 - 1069.

Gvozdii, S., Litvinova, A., & Tymchenko, G. (2023). Connectivism theory in safety and health education in classical universities. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 10(1), 133 - 142.

Ilyosovna, N. A. (2020). The importance of English language. International Journal on Orange Technologies, 2(1), 22 – 24.

Khamsuk, A., & Whanchit, W. (2021). Storytelling: An alternative home delivery of English vocabulary for preschoolers during COVID-19's lockdown in southern Thailand. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 11(1), 1 – 13.

Kropf, D. C. (2013). Connectivism: 21st century's new learning theory. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(2), 13 - 24.

McKay, S. L. (2018). English as an international language: What it is and what it means for pedagogy. RELC Journal, 49(1), 9 - 23.

Methitham, P. (2017). Myth, power, and domination (p. 21). Naresuan University Press.

Nguyen, V.T., & Seepho, S. (2023). Factors fostering general pedagogical knowledge development of Vietnamese pre-service English teachers in the connectivist learning environment. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 30 - 54.

Phulthong, W., Sonthirak, T., & Kasemchok, K. (2024). Competency based assessment language using the CEFR for teaching and learning contexts in Thailand. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 29(4), 14 - 30.

Plengsantia, J. (2022). The effect of using active learning to promote English communication speaking skills for grade 10th students. Journal of Education. Silpakorn University, 20(2), 138 - 152.

Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2020). Preparing for industry 4.0—Will youths have enough essential skills?: An evidence from Thailand. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 89 – 104.

Rajprasit, K. (2022). Design and development of an English as a global language MOOC to increase global Englishes awareness: Evaluation in a Thai university. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 28(1), 121 – 138.

Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal of English, 4(1), 65 – 79.

Supaso, S., & Wongsaphan, M. (2019). The course development for teacher in learning English activity for communication through professional learning. Dhammathas Academic Journal, l19(2), 36 - 47.

Wongwatkit, C., Thongsibsong, N., Chomngern, T., & Thavorn, S. (2023). The future of connectivist learning with the potential of emerging technologies and ai in Thailand: trends, applications, and challenges in shaping education. Journal of Learning Sciences and Education, 2(1), 122 - 154.

Yodsaneha, S., Sompong, N., & Soopeerak, S. (2020). U-learning model based on connectivism theory for English conversation skill development among the students at Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. Journal of Social Science and Buddhistic Anthropology, 5(8), 344 - 355.