Operational Efficiency of Administrative Officials Criminal Case Office the Office of the Attorney General

Abstract

The objectives of this research were 3 (1) to assess the performance level of administrative officials. Criminal Case Office Attorney General's Office. (2) to compare the efficiency in the performance of duties of administrative officials; Criminal Case Office of the Attorney General Classified by Personal Factors and (3) to propose guidelines for improving efficiency in the performance of administrative officials; Criminal Case Office Attorney General's Office It is a combination of volume research, population of 62 people, including administrative officials. Criminal Case Office Attorney General's Office. Collect data using questionnaires. The statistics used in the data analysis were percentage, mean, standard deviation. analysis of variance one-way and t-value analysis and quality research Criminal Case Office Attorney General's Office Data was collected through in-depth interviews and content analysis. Research results (1) on the level of efficiency in the performance of administrative officials The Office of Criminal Litigation, Office of the Attorney General found that the overall level was at the highest level. (2) Comparison of the performance of administrative officials The Criminal Case Office of the Attorney General's Office classified by personal factors. It was found that personal factors were different. And (3) guidelines for the development of efficiency in the performance of administrative officers Criminal Case Office The Attorney General's Office found that Consisting of: (a) duties or performance goals should be defined in advance to help meet the scope of work (b) should review the performance Each task is clearly assigned tasks to reduce redundant operations and (c) There should be training on how to operate properly in accordance with the procedures so that operators can operate properly in accordance with regulations and laws.