DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING APPROACH TO PROMOTE ORAL ENGLISH ABILITY OF VOCATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The objectives of this research were 1) to examine the factors affecting oral English ability of vocational undergraduate students in Guangxi Province of China, 2) to develop project-based learning instructional model to promote oral English ability of vocational undergraduate students and 3) to study the results of project-based learning instructional model to promote oral English ability of undergraduate students. Phases were carried out to answer research objectives 1, 2, and 3. The population of Phase 1 were 96 sophomore students and 3 lecturers of workplace English course in semester 1 academic year 2023 from Guangxi Vocational University of Agriculture, Guangxi City Vocational University and from Nanning College for Vocational Technology. The target group of Phase 2 were 3 experts, and the sample group of Phase 3 were 32 students who enrolled in workplace English course of Guangxi Vocational University of Agriculture. The research instruments were 1) A set of questionnaires for students, and interview for lecturers, 2) A set of questionnaires for conformity instructional model, 3) Lesson plans using project-based learning instructional model, and 4) Scoring rubric form. Data analyzed by percentage, mean and standard deviation.The results revealed the following. 1) The factors to promote oral English ability of vocational undergraduate students were the internal and external factors. The internal factors included language foundations like listening ability, grammatical and vocabulary level and students’ level of interest, familiarity and knowledge about the topics and activities. The external factor included interesting and authentic oral activities, well-designed lesson plans and teachers’ efficacy in oral skills and pedagogical knowledge, 2) The project-based learning approach to promote oral English ability in workplace English course of vocational undergraduate students included 5 components: (1) principle and rationale, (2) objectives, (3) contents, (4) method of teaching & materials and (5) evaluation. The model was 100% conformed to utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy standards as assessed by 3 specialists and, 3) After testing the research hypothesis, it can be found that the given treatment influences students' oral English ability at significance level 0.000. In addition, the overall developmental scores of individual students' oral English ability of total 6 dimensions are generally found at High level. There were 10 students or 31.25% of all students at "Very High" developmental level of oral English ability of total 6 dimensions; 18 students or 56.25% at "High" developmental level; 4 students or 12.50% at "Moderate" developmental level; No student or 0.00% at "Low" developmental level and the findings from interviews with lecturers in Guangxi, China, regarding factors influencing vocational undergraduate students' oral English ability. Most lecturers are female (66.67%), with over 9 years of teaching experience, primarily aged 36-49. Internal factors like teachers' knowledge, psychological state, and attitude significantly affect students' oral proficiency. Confidence, enthusiasm, and a student-centered approach are highlighted. External factors such as teaching methods, materials, and environment also play crucial roles. Practical, real-world content, diversified resources, and a relaxed classroom atmosphere are emphasized. Small class sizes, flexible seating, and access to necessary devices contribute to oral English development. The article underscores the importance of holistic teaching approaches and suggests providing teacher training and creating a positive learning atmosphere to enhance oral English education.
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Adderley, K. & Society for Research into Higher Education. Working Party on Teaching Methods. Techniques Group. (1975). Project Methods in Higher Educatio. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental Consideration in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker, J., & Westrup, H. (2003). Essential Speaking Skills: A Handbook for English Language Teachers. London: Continuum.
BIE. (2003). Project based learning. http://www.bie.org/pbl/pbloverview/definition.php. Date Accessed: 1 June 2010.
Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Chaney, A.L., and Burk, T.L. (1998). Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cheng, M. M., & Wu, S. (2017). Reflections and suggestions on English teaching and learning in higher vocational education: Based on a survey on the status quo and reform needs of foreign language testing in higher vocational colleges. Foreign Language World, 14(06), 13-17.
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. (Revised ed.), Boston: D.C. Heath.
Dewey, J. (2001). Democracy and Education (Wang, C.X., Trans.). Beijing: People's Education Press.
Duffy, T. M. & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc.
Feng, H. (2017). A study on cultivation approaches for college students’ oral ability at workplace. Journal of Jiamusi Vocational Institute, (1), 279.
Fried-Booth, D. (2002). Project work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Glasersfeld, E. V. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: Falmar Press. p. 44-47.
Goh, C. M. (2007). Teaching Speaking in the Language Classroom. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Harris, P. D. (1974). Testing English as a Second Language. New York: McGraw Hill Publishing.
Heitman, G. (1996). Project-oriented study and project-organisized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions, European Journal of Engineering Education, (21),121-132.
Johnson, L., Smith, R. Smythe, J. & Varon, R. (2008). Challenge Based Learning: An Approach for Our Time. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Kafai, Y. & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking and Learning in a Digital World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19, 319.
Leong, L., & Masoumeh, A. S. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 34–41.
Legutke, M. & Thomas, H. (1991). Process and Experience in the Language Classroom. New York: Longman Group.
Luan, L. & Zhao, H. J. (2017). The study of Chinese students’ oral proficiency scale for workplace English. Journal of Liaoning University of Technology (Social Science Edition), (2), 133-136.
Luan, L. (2019). The construct study of oral communicative ability for workplace English. Journal of Ezhou University, (3), 66-68.
Mead, N. A. & Rubin, D. L. (1985). Assessing Listening and Speaking Skills. ERIC Digest. ERIC Publications.
Muñoz, A., Casals, S., Gaviria, S., & Palacio U. M. (2012). Guidelines for Oral Assessment. (Group Investigation Report, Universidad EAFIT).
Nunan, D. (1995). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. NY: Phoenix Ltd., p. 593.
Railsback, J. (2002). Project-based instruction: Creating excitement for learning. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. http://www.nwrel.org/request/2002aug/index.html.
Sarwar, Z. (2000). The golden gates of English in the golden context. In W.K. Ho & C. Ward (Eds.), Language in the Global Context: Implications for the Language Classroom (RELC Anthology Series 41), 32-56. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Stoller, F. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts, in G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-Based Second and Foreign Language Education: past, present, and future (pp. 19-40), Information Age Publishing.
Tremblay, R., Duplantie, M. & Huot, D. (1990). National Core Frech Study: Communicative-experiential Syllabus. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Second Language Teachers, 58-59.
Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching. Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wei, X., Wu, S., & Zhuang, W. X. (2018). The Investigation and analysis of the status quo and needs of English competence in the workplace of China. Foreign Language World, 01, 43-51.
Worthy, J. (2000). Conducting research on topics of student interest. Reading Teacher, 54(3), 298-299.
Yan, M. (2016). A constructive study of discursive practice-based communicative competence of English for professional purposes. Foreign Language Research, (6), 110-115.
Yang, C. Q. (2011). An Integration of oral college English teaching and workplace scenes. China Electric Power Education, (5), 182-183.
Zhang, L., Li, X. H.& Li, Y. (2016). Application of PBL teaching model in college oral English teaching illustrated by Sino-Germany cooperative classes in North China University of Science and Technology. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), (4), 125-130.