The Impact of Korean-Style Political Aesthetics on Trust and Engagement Among Thai Undergraduate Students

Main Article Content

Kittituch Orisoon
Byeongho Mun

บทคัดย่อ

This study examines how Korean-style political aesthetics, shaped by Hallyu soft visual identities and idol-like personas, influence political trust and engagement among Thai undergraduate students. Drawing on visual politics, processing fluency, and soft power theories, the research addresses a gap in Southeast Asian scholarship regarding the political impact of transnational cultural aesthetics at the individual level. A cross-sectional survey of 400 students in Bangkok used validated scales to measure Hallyu consumption, perceptions of political aesthetics, political trust, and political engagement. Data were analyzed with t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression. Results revealed a Gender Paradox: Females reported significantly higher Hallyu consumption and aesthetic recognition, yet gender did not predict political trust when controlling for aesthetic perception. Instead, perceived Korean-style aesthetics emerged as the strongest driver of trust (β = .229, p < .001), functioning as a universal marker of modernity. Academic discipline moderated outcomes, with medical and health sciences students showing highest trust and science/engineering students the lowest. Political trust strongly predicted engagement (β = .344, p < .001), indicating that aestheticized politics can mobilize Gen Z voters beyond passive consumption. These findings suggest Korean-style aesthetics serve as cognitive shortcuts that operate alongside, rather than replace, traditional predictors of political behavior.

Article Details

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
Orisoon, K., & Mun, B. (2026). The Impact of Korean-Style Political Aesthetics on Trust and Engagement Among Thai Undergraduate Students. วารสารปราชญ์ประชาคม, 4(4), 399–409. สืบค้น จาก https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/watmahasawat_jsc/article/view/6859
ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Boulianne, S. (2020). Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political

participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218808186

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Desatova, P. (2018). Thailand 4.0 and the Internal Focus of Nation Branding. Asian Studies

Review, 42(4), 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2018.1512555

Elfving-Hwang, J. (2018). K-pop idols, artificial beauty and affective fan relationships in

South Korea. In A. Elliott (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Celebrity Studies (pp. 190–201). Routledge.

Hojat, M., Vergare, M. J., Maxwell, K., Brainard, G., Herrine, S. K., Isenberg, G. A., Veloski, J., & Gonnella, J. S. (2009). The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 84(9), 1182–1191. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55

Jin, D. Y. (2016). New Korean wave: Transnational cultural power in the age of social media.

University of Illinois Press.

Kahan, D. M. (2016). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 2: Unanswered

questions. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0418

Kongkirati, P. (2019). From Illiberal Democracy to Military Authoritarianism: Intra-Elite

Struggle and Mass-Based Conflict in Deeply Polarized Thailand. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218806912

McCargo, D. (2019). Southeast Asia’s Troubling Elections: Democratic Demolition in Thailand. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 119–133. https://doi.org/ 10.1353/jod.2019.0056

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

Nye, J. S. (2021). Soft Power: The Evolution of a Concept. Journal of Political Power, 14(1),

–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1879572

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news

is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011

Phoborisut, P. (2020). Reimagining dissent in Thailand’s 2020 uprising. SAIS Review of

International Affairs, 40(2), 43–55.

Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386

Sinpeng, A. (2021). Opposing Democracy in the Digital Age: The Yellow Shirts in Thailand.

University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11666233

Street, J. (2019). What is Donald Trump? Forms of ‘Celebrity’ in Celebrity Politics. Political

Studies Review, 17(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918772995

Tapsell, R. (2021). Social Media and Elections in Southeast Asia: The Emergence of

Subversive, Underground Campaigning. Asian Studies Review, 45(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1841093

Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589