Strategic Public Administration: The Adaptation of the Thai Bureaucracy in an Era of Uncertainty

Main Article Content

หฤษดิ์ โรจนวีรกร
Phraathikhan Rapin thitadhammo (wongpromma)
Sutthiphan Aranyawat

Abstract

       


In the contemporary global context characterized by pervasive uncertainty—driven by rapid technological change, emerging infectious diseases, and global economic crises—the Thai bureaucratic system, as the principal mechanism for implementing public policy, must transition from traditional hierarchical and rule-based administration toward a strategic approach that is flexible, dynamic, and responsive to change. This article examines the concept of strategic public administration, the nature of uncertainty in public sector governance, and the adaptive pathways of the Thai bureaucratic system. It also proposes policy options aimed at enhancing the competitiveness and sustainability of Thailand’s public administration in the future


The findings indicate that the Thai bureaucracy is increasingly oriented toward inter-agency integration, the adoption of digital technologies in public management (digital government), and the development of human capital with stronger strategic and analytical capabilities. However, significant constraints remain, including rigid organizational structures, rule-bound administrative culture, and limitations in decentralization. Furthermore, the analysis highlights that strengthening institutional agility and advancing governance systems grounded in participatory principles are critical factors for enabling the Thai bureaucratic system to effectively and sustainably cope with uncertainty in the long term.

Article Details

How to Cite
โรจนวีรกร ห., thitadhammo (wongpromma), P. R., & Aranyawat, S. (2026). Strategic Public Administration: The Adaptation of the Thai Bureaucracy in an Era of Uncertainty. Journal of Setthawit Review, 6(1), 2133–2148. retrieved from https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/stw/article/view/3315
Section
Academic Article

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 17(1), 99–120.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review. 74(4), 445–456.

Cellary, W., & Picard, W. (2011). Agile and pro-active public administration as a collaborative networked organization.

Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight. 10(1), 4–21.

Kettl, D. F. (2020). The divided states of America: Why governance is failing and what we can do about it. Princeton University Press.

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: A handbook for development practitioners. World Bank.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly. 36(4), 101385.

Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. Jossey-Bass.

OECD. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis: A catalyst for government transformation? https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-covid-19-crisis-a-catalyst-for- government-transformation-3f5d5a80/

Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.

Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review. 70(s1), s246–s254.

Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable. Random House.

The101.world. (2022). ตั้งโจทย์รัฐ ปฏิรูประบบใหม่ ทำอย่างไรให้ “ราชการไทย” ทันสมัยและตอบโจทย์ประชาชน. https://www.the101.world/public-administration-reform/

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2022). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2022.

World Bank. (2023). Thailand economic monitor: Innovation for productivity.

https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/thailand/publication/thailand-economic-monitor- june-2023

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาระบบราชการ. (2550). แนวคิดพื้นฐานเพื่อจัดทำคำรับรองการปฏิบัติราชการ. สถาบันดำรงราชานุภาพ.