State, Community, and Religious Organization: Actors and Roles in the Wildfire Management Network in Phu Long, Phu Laenkha Mountain Range, Chaiyaphum Province
Keywords:
Phu Long Forest, wildfire management, networkAbstract
Wildfire management is a complex public problem that exceeds the capacity of the government to address independently. Consequently, network-based approaches have gained increasing attention. This study aims to examine the actors and their roles within the wildfire management network in Phu Long Forest, located in the Phu Laenkha Mountain Range, Chaiyaphum Province, involving three sectors: the government, the community, and religious organizations. A qualitative case study methodology was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 11 key informants and non-participant observation. Data analysis was conducted using content analysis and triangulation.
The findings reveal that wildfire management in Phu Long operates under a collaborative network model characterized by horizontal relationships, consultation, and interdependence among actors. The Ban Tat Rin Thong Community Forest Committee serves as the primary actor in the network. Government agencies, including the Forest Protection Unit Chaiyaphum 7 (Tat Rin Thong) and the That Thong Subdistrict Municipality, as well as religious organizations such as Wat Pa Mahawan, play supportive roles by providing resources for prevention, response, and recovery.
References
ชาลี นวธราดล. (2567, 23 กุมภาพันธ์). ข้อมูลไฟป่าในไทยย้อนหลัง 10 ปี เผาผลาญไปมากกว่า 1 ล้านไร่.https://www.thaipbs.or.th/now/content/845
ส่วนควบคุมไฟป่า. (ม.ป.ป.). สถิติไฟป่า. กรมอุทยานแห่งชาติ สัตว์ป่าและพันธุ์พืช. สืบค้นเมื่อ 20 มีนาคม 2569, จาก https://portal.dnp.go.th/Content/firednp?contentId=15705
สำนักจัดการทรัพยากรป่าไม้ที่ 10 ราชบุรี. (2558). คู่มือการปฏิบัติงานสำหรับเจ้าหน้าที่ในการจัดตั้งพุทธอุทยาน. http://new.forest.go.th/wp-content/uploads/sites/74/2015/09/พุทธอุทยาน-รูปเล่ม.pdf
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
FAO. (2020). Global Fire Management Strategy. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance Networks in the Public Sector. Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Mode of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1187-1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Social Sciences Outlook

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License