Enhancement of Justice System Interventions for High-Risk Violent Psychiatric Patients

Main Article Content

Aranee Vivatthanaporn
Navapat Narongsak

Abstract

This research aims to investigate problems in the Thai justice system’s operations concerning psychiatric patients at high risk of committing violence and develop appropriate and effective operational strategies. The study employed document analysis and in-depth interviews with eighteen key informants. Additionally, a focus group discussion was held with six participants from professional groups.


The research identified several issues within the Thai justice system, categorized into four key areas: 1) Manpower including a shortage of correctional and police officers, a lack of medical professionals with relevant expertise, overburdened staff, inadequate understanding among relatives and the public, and insufficient knowledgeable justice personnel; 2) Insufficient budget (Money); 3) Materials: insufficient inpatient bed capacity due to the limited number of psychiatric hospitals in Thailand, along with a shortage of vehicles, ambulances, and essential operational equipment; and 4) Management: prolonged justice system procedures and treatment duration, limited inter-agency collaboration, inefficiencies in referral and follow-up systems, absence of a dedicated responsible agency, legal constraints hindering law enforcement operations, and lack of data integration and a unified patient information platform.


To enhance the effectiveness of the Thai justice system operations, the research recommended: 1) expanding medical and justice system personnel, including psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, forensic psychiatric nurses, psychologists, social workers, and related professionals; 2) promoting accurate knowledge of psychiatric patient care among society, communities, and families; 3) promoting accurate knowledge of psychiatric patient care among related personnel; 4) promoting inter-agency collaboration or a collaborative network involving external government and private agencies; 5) establishing an organization specifically responsible for psychiatric patient care to enhance the effectiveness of treatment and the judicial process; 6) streamlining procedures for handling psychiatric patients; 7) improving the sufficiency of bed capacity for psychiatric patients; and 8) increasing budget allocation for relevant agencies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vivatthanaporn, A., & Narongsak, N. (2025). Enhancement of Justice System Interventions for High-Risk Violent Psychiatric Patients. Journal of Contemporary Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.59796/jcsh.v12i2.35-45
Section
Research article

References

Chareonwongsak, K. (2000). The network management: importance strategy to the success of education reform. Bangkok: Success Media.

Daff, E., & Thomas, S. D. (2014). Bipolar disorder and criminal offending: a data linkage study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49, 1985-1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-014-0882-4

Inthachuea, R. (2020). Factors influencing the success of educational network development for elderly schools (Master’s thesis, National Institute of Development Administration, Graduate School of Public Administration).

Suwanmaitree, S., Sarsorak, A., Chantalakwon, T., Sianglum, C., & Mekwilai, W. (2017). A handbook for the care of patients with schizophrenia for hospitals in health regions (For nurses/public health academics) (2nd ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: Victoria Image Co., Ltd.

Thaiwong, K. (2021). The development of preventive measures against recidivism in psychiatric patients. (Master’s thesis). Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Thavorn, P. & Kulnitas, N. (2020). Criminal prosecution and social coexistence with psychiatric patients. In Proceedings of the National Research Conference, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.