Data Science in Policing in Thailand: Challenges and Future Directions – A Review From International Perspectives

Main Article Content

Phirapat Mangkhalasiri
Krisanaphong Poothakool

Abstract

Data science has become an essential element in contemporary policing, offering tools to enhance crime prevention, improve resource allocation, and strengthen decision-making. In Thailand, however, the integration of data science into policing is still in its early stages, characterised by fragmented initiatives and limited strategic direction. This article examines the current state of data science in Thai policing through a critical review of international practices and conceptual frameworks. Drawing from examples in the United States, United Kingdom, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan, it highlights how different governance models have shaped the adoption of predictive analytics, algorithmic tools, and evidence-based policing. While Thailand has made initial progress in developing digital crime databases and surveillance systems, efforts remain inconsistent and lack overarching coordination and ethical oversight. The article identifies both opportunities such as enhanced inter-agency collaboration and data-driven resource deployment and challenges, including infrastructural fragmentation, ethical risks, and institutional resistance. It concludes with a set of policy recommendations for the Thai government, including the creation of a national framework, investment in research-led training, ethical regulation of surveillance technologies, and stronger partnerships with academia and civil society. The article argues for a locally grounded, balanced approach to data-informed policing that prioritises effectiveness, legitimacy, and public trust.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mangkhalasiri, P., & Poothakool, K. (2025). Data Science in Policing in Thailand: Challenges and Future Directions – A Review From International Perspectives. Journal of Contemporary Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(2), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.59796/jcsh.v12i2.18-34
Section
Research article

References

Amoore, L., & Piotukh, V. (2015). Life beyond big data: Governing with little analytics. Economy and Society, 44(3), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1043793

Babuta, A., & Oswald, M. (2021). Machine learning predictive algorithms and the policing of future crimes: Governance and oversight. Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 214-236). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

Bayley, D. H. (1991). Forces of order: Policing modern Japan. California, US: University of California Press.

Belknap, J. (2016). Asian criminology’s expansion and advancement of research and crime control practices. Asian Journal of Criminology, 11, 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-016-9240-7

Berman, E. M. (2010). Public administration in Southeast Asia: Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Macao. Florida, US: CRC Press.

Bratton, W. J., & Malinowski, S. W. (2008). Police performance management in practice: Taking COMPSTAT to the next level. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 2(3), 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pan036

Brayne, S. (2017). Big data surveillance: The case of policing. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 977-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865

Brayne, S. (2021). Predict and surveil: Data, discretion, and the future of policing. New York, US: Oxford University Press.

Broadhurst, R., Grabosky, P., Alazab, M., Bouhours, B., & Chon, S. (2014). An analysis of the nature of groups engaged in cyber crime. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(1), 1-20.

Brown, B. (2020). Public perceptions of police crime control in South Korea. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 6(4), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-01-2020-0002

Casey, E. (2011). Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet. Massachusetts, US: Academic press.

Chan, J. (1996). Changing police culture. The British Journal of Criminology, 36(1), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014061

Farrell, A., Pfeffer, R., & Bright, K. (2015). Police perceptions of human trafficking. Journal of Crime and Justice, 38(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2014.995412

Ferguson, A. G. (2017). The rise of big data policing: Surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement. In The Rise of Big Data Policing. New York, US: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479854608.001.0001

Han, S., LaPrade, J., & Hwang, E. (2022). Is a decentralized police organization a better option in a modern democratic society? A case study from South Korea. Police Quarterly, 25(3), 364-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211042034

Harcourt, B. E. (2019). Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226315997.001.0001

Joh, E. E. (2019). Policing the smart city. International Journal of Law in Context, 15(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552319000107

Johnson, D. T. (2002). The Japanese way of justice: Prosecuting crime in Japan. New York, US: Oxford University Press.

Joo, H. J. (2015). Crime and criminal justice in South Korea: Editor’s introduction. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-015-9209-y

Kim, H. (2016). Institute of Criminal Justice Studies (Doctoral dissertation), University of Portsmouth, UK.

Lim, M. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Surveillance technologies in Singapore. Surveillance & Society, 16(3), 371–388.

Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2011). Public criminology? Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

Longworth, J. (2021). Benjamin Ruha (2019) Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford: Polity Press. Science & Technology Studies, 34(2), 92-94.

Lum, C., & Koper, C. S. (2017). Evidence-based policing: Translating research into practice. New York, US: Oxford University Press.

Lum, C., & Koper, C. S. (2024). Evidence-based policing. The Oxford handbook of evidence-based crime and justice policy, 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618110.013.13

Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To predict and serve?. Significance, 13(5), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00960.x

Mangkhalasiri, P. (2024). Challenges of investigating and prosecuting child sex trafficking and child labour trafficking in Thailand (Doctoral dissertation), University of London, University College London, UK.

McDaniel, J. L., & Pease, K. (Eds.). (2021). Predictive policing and artificial intelligence. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Meijer, A., & Wessels, M. (2019). Predictive policing: Review of benefits and drawbacks. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(12), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1575664

Miyashita, H. (2022). Data protection laws in Japan. In Research Handbook on Privacy and Data Protection Law (pp. 128-139). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Mohler, G. O., Short, M. B., Malinowski, S., Johnson, M., Tita, G. E., Bertozzi, A. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (2015). Randomized controlled field trials of predictive policing. Journal of the American statistical association, 110(512), 1399-1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1077710

Moon, H., Choi, H., Lee, J., & Lee, K. S. (2017). Attitudes in Korea toward introducing smart policing technologies: Differences between the general public and police officers. Sustainability, 9(10), 1921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101921

National Police Agency (NPA). (2024). White paper on police 2024. Government of Japan. Retrieved from https://www.npa.go.jp/english/publication/r06_english_hakusyo.pdf

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Government at a glance: Trust in public institutions. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/government-at-a-glance-2025_0efd0bcd-en/full-report/drivers-of-trust-in-public-institutions_fe2b7742.html

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Massachusetts, US: Harvard University Press.

Perry, W. L., McInnis, B., Price, C. C., Smith, S. C., & Hollywood, J. S. (2013). Predictive policing: The role of crime forecasting in law enforcement operations. RAND Corporation.

Poothakool, K. (2014). Police reform perspectives. Rangsit Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 35-42. https://jcsh.rsu.ac.th/files/issues/V1N1/5_20190506195739.pdf

Poothakool, K., & Glendinning, T. (2013). Police reform in Thailand post-2006. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2, 371-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.35

Poothakool, K., & Meephiam, P. (2022). Law enforcement and public health approaches in the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 7(Suppl_1), S23-S27. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.247

Poston, B. (2020). LAPD to end predictive policing program. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/

Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science for business. California, US: O’Reilly Media.

Rahman, M. F. B. A. (2017). Smart CCTVs for secure cities: Potentials and challenges. Retrieved from https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/resources/docs/RSIS-Smart%20CCTVs%20for%20Secure%20Cities,%20Potential%20and%20Challenges.pdf

Rodan, G. (2014). Conflict, oppositional spaces and political representation in Southeast Asia. In Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Democratization (pp. 129-146). Routledge.

Santad, P., Kanchanakit, C., & Stitwatananont, K. (2023). Development guideline for the enforcement of the anti-participation in Transnational Organized Crime Act 2013. International Journal of Crime, Law and Social Issues, 10(1), 40-52. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4574656

Saunders, J., Hunt, P., & Hollywood, J. S. (2016). Predictions put into practice: A quasi-experimental evaluation of Chicago’s predictive policing pilot. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12, 347-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9272-0

Sherman, L. W. (2013). The rise of evidence-based policing: Targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 377–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/670819

Shimpo, F. (2023). Privacy and data protection law in Japan. Kluwer Law International.

Taylor, L. (2017). What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335

Telep, C. W., & Lum, C. (2014). The receptivity of officers to empirical research and evidence-based policing: An examination of survey data from three agencies. Police Quarterly, 17(4), 359-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611114548099

The Nation. (2023). Poll finds most Thais lack confidence in the performance of police officers. Retrieved from https://www.nationthailand.com/thailand/general/40031710

Thompson, S. (2022). Data-driven approaches to crime prevention and law enforcement. American Journal of Data Science and Analysis, 3(2), 10-14.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. New Jersey, US: Princeton University Press.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2024). Guidelines for the governance of statistical data in the criminal justice system. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/statistics/Statistical_guidelines_governance.pdf

Weisburd, D., Telep, C. W., Hinkle, J. C., & Eck, J. E. (2010). Is problem-oriented policing effective in reducing crime and disorder? Criminology & Public Policy, 9(1), 139–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00617.x

Yamamoto, T. (2021). AI and the Japanese constitution. In Advancing Responsible Innovation: AI Workshop Report (3.1.5). United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs and Institute for Future Initiatives, University of Tokyo. Retrieved from https://ifi.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/UNODA_IFI-AI-WS_report2.pdf

Zhang, X. (2021). Analysis of smart cities in Singapore based artificial intelligence. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Artificial Intelligence (RAAI), Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/RAAI52226.2021.9507784