Degrees and Promoting Factors of Student Engagement at Bangkok Christian College
Keywords:
Student engagement, promoting factors, secondary educationAbstract
This research aimed to (1) examine the degrees of student engagement in school operations at Bangkok Christian College in Academic Year 2024, and (2) investigate the promoting factors of student engagement in school operations under study. A multistage quantitative-qualitative methods (Explanatory Design) was used, with a constructed questionnaire on student engagement, followed by a semi-structured interview tool. The participants consisted of 246 Grade 12 students and five school administrators, totaling 251 individuals. The results revealed that the participating students exhibited a high degrees of student engagement, with emotional engagement rated the highest (𝑥̅ = 4.04, SD = 0.694), followed by behavioral (𝑥̅ = 3.71, SD = 0.667), and cognitive engagement (𝑥̅ = 3.67, SD = 0.766), respectively. The promoting factors were categorized into three domains. (i) In the aspect of personnel, teachers played a vital role in providing reasoning to guide student behavior rather than give directive commands. (ii) Positive teacher-student relationships and individual follow-up were key strengths, and peer influence was found to positively affect learning behaviors. (iii) In terms of management, the school provided meaningful and challenging activities that encouraged participation, gave students opportunities to express their opinions, and helped them feel involved in the classroom process. Clear and transparent assessment criteria enabled students to set goals and monitor their academic progress. In addition, learning resources support classroom climate; and well-paced learning activities contributed to students’ concentration and engagement. Although physical learning tools were not explicitly emphasized, their value was embedded in the meaningful activities designed to foster authentic learning experiences. The obtained findings were expected to generate practical implications for secondary school management in similar contexts in support of students’ responsive engagement strategies, positive attitudes, and learning experiences.
References
Aeamtussana, T., Prayai, N., Kamwachirapitak, R. & Yamsang, W. (2017). A causal model of personal and social factors on student engagement of senior high school students. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 10(3), 52-67.
Aminpoor, H. & Zare, H. (2025). Compiling a structural model of academic engagement based on emotional schemas and metacognitive skills with the mediation of academic emotions in students of Payame Noor University. The Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 21(1), 35-55. doi 10.22051/JONTOE.2025.49254.4001
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L. & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York, USA: Springer.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. C. & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B. & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring Student Engagement in Upper Elementary through High School: A Description of 21 Instruments. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2011-No. 098. Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
Hazel, C. E., Vazirabadi, G. E., Albanes, J. & Gallagher, J. (2014). Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Student School Engagement Measure. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 806.
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R. & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53.
Jones, G. & George, J. (2015). Contemporary Management. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Klincumhom, T. & Ruengtrakul, A. (2014). A causal model of student engagement and academic achievement by teachers’ effects. OJED, 9(2), 264-278.
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 Results (Volume III): Creative Minds, Creative Schools. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/765ee8c2-en
Reschly, A. L. & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 3-19. New York, USA: Springer.
Skinner, E. A. & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 21-44. New York, USA: Springer.
Virtanen, T. E., Kiuru, N., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M. & Kuorelahti, M. (2016). Assessment of student engagement among junior high school students and associations with self-esteem, burnout, and academic achievement. Journal for Educational Research Online, 8(2), 136-157.
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L. & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16-26.
Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school. A sense of belonging and participation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 1-84.
Zepke, N. & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167-177.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
