The Influence of Product Assortment on Consumer Process Satisfaction
Keywords:
Product assortment, product involvement, decision-making difficulty, consumer process satisfactionAbstract
With the development of the market economy, the classification of products or product assortment affects consumers’ decision-making and satisfaction. In recent years, many researchers have shown that classification has an important influence on consumer satisfaction, but most domestic and international studies have focused on the scope of classification. Some international literature has also discussed product classification, but not on classification types. Structural matching theory reveals the effect of different types of classification on consumer process satisfaction, and its impact mechanism. At the same time, product involvement is added as a regulatory variable to explore its role in product classification and consumer satisfaction. Product assortment is currently relevant to online shopping malls, product manuals, and other corporate communication tools. While companies provide a wide range of product information for consumers to choose from, they need to pay attention to customers' differences in types and preferences coming into contact with such information. For marketers, there is also a varied perception of the assorted product types. In this regard, this research aims to (i) assort products into both high and low involvement products according to the extent to which the degree of involvement in each product can impact consumers’ decision-making, and (ii) investigate whether different types of products yield different levels of consumer process satisfaction. The researcher used an online survey questionnaire to collect needed data from 183 voluntary respondents. Based on the obtained findings, it is expected that the adjustment effect of product involvement can impact the effect of assortment type on consumers’ decision-making and process satisfaction, as practical implications for operations in marketing communications.
References
Chatterjee, S. & Heath, T. B. (1996). Conflict and loss aversion in multi-attribute choice: The effects of trade-off size and reference dependence on decision difficulty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(2), 144-155.
Chemev, A. (2003a). Product assortment and individual decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(l),151-162.
Chemev, A. (2003b). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 530(2), 170-183.
Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 215-231.
Fitzsimons, G. T., Greenleaf, E. A. & Lehmann, D. R. (1997). Decision and consumption satisfaction: Implications for channel relations. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 312-323.
Hauser, J. R. & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. The Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393-408.
Iyengar, S. S. & Lepper, M. (2001). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995-1006.
Johar, G. V. (1995). Consumer involvement and perceptions of source credibility in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 35-49.
Kahn, B. E. & Wansink, B. (2004). The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 519 -533.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T. & Jyengar, S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: How the presence of assortments increases choosers' perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 202-215.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534-552.
Schwartz, B. (2005). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278-292.
Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55(1), 79-88.
Timmermans, D. (1993). The impact of task complexity on information use in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 95-111.
Tversky, S. S. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
Tversky, S. S. & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision. Psychological Science, 3(6), 358-36.
Wright, P. (1975). Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying vs. optimizing. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 60-67.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
