EFFECTIVE CURRICULUM ADMINISTRATION MODEL FOR ENHANCING VOCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION IN APPLIED UNIVERSITIES IN YUNNAN PROVINCE
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This research article aims to: 1) To study the level of curriculum administration at the Applied Universities in Yunnan Province; 2) To study the factors influencing the effectiveness of curriculum administration at the Applied Universities in Yunnan Province; 3) To propose the development of an effective curriculum administration model for Applied Universities in Yunnan Province.
The research results found that:
1) A sequential mixed-methods design was employed, integrating qualitative insights from expert interviews with quantitative survey data from 550 administrators, teachers, and curriculum experts across 10 universities. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) for model validation.
2) The current level of curriculum administration is moderately high (M=3.67) but exhibits a significant "perception-implementation gap" among stakeholders. Six core latent factors were validated as key drivers: Industry-Synergy Capability, Strategic Resource Orchestration, Teacher Development Support, Data-Informed Evaluation & Improvement, Stakeholder Engagement Cohesion, and Curriculum Adaptability & Innovation. The final structural model explains 75% of the variance in effectiveness (R²=0.75), with Industry-Synergy Capability (β=0.35) being the most influential.
3) This research contributes an empirically grounded, context-specific "capability ecosystem" framework. It moves beyond linear management models by proposing a dynamic model tailored to Yunnan's unique industrial, ethnic, and cross-border characteristics, offering both theoretical advancement and a practical roadmap for curriculum reform.
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Fernando, Y., Islam, U. K., Sjech, N., Djamil, M., Bukittinggi, D., Mariyanti, N., & Ilmi, D. (2023). Konsep Administrasi Kurikulum Dalam Pendidikan. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JUPENDIS), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.54066/ jupendis.v2i1.1244
Fatimah, M., Tisnawati, T., & Soleha, Z. (2024). Peran Administrasi Kurikulum dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan: Tinjauan Tugas
Guru pada Implementasi Kurikulum. TSAQOFAH, 4(6). DOI:10.58578/tsaqofah. v4i6.3963.
Ikhlas, R. (2020, January 3). Administrasi Kurikulum. https://doi.org/10.31227/ osf.io/r9duv
Ulya, D. (2020). Administrasi Kurikulum. DOI:10.31227/osf.io/bhndy Corpus ID: 241537237
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K.E. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product
Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15, 57-84.
Kaur, K. (2014). Total Quality Management. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 4, 11-18.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Finch, C.R. (1991). Leadership Behaviors of Successful Vocational Education Administrators. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 16, 1-35.
Yang, Z., & Dong, F. (2024). Integration of Education and Industry in China: Lessons from Germany Applied Universities. International Journal of Management Science Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.53469/ijomsr. 2024.07(02).07
Liu, L. (2023). Thoughts on the Application-oriented Private Universities' Implementation of Practical Teaching through Industry-Education Integration. Journal of Human Resource Development, 5(4), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.23977/jhrd.2023.050410
Li, M., Ruan, N., & Ma, J. (2022). Organizational Innovation of Chinese Universities of Applied Sciences in Less-Developed Regional Innovation Systems. Sustainability, 14(23), 16198. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316198
Luo, F. (2024). A Study on the Policies and Practices of Digital International Education Cooperation between Higher Education Institutions in Yunnan and South and Southeast Asian Countries. Yixin Publisher. https://doi.org/10.59825/jcs.2024.2.10.78
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome - based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1967). The formative and summative evaluation of educational programs. American Educational Research Journal, 4 (1), 1 - 27.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.