A MODEL FOR CREATING CIVIL PEACE TO REDUCE CONFLICT IN MIDDLE-CLASS SOCIETY, PHETCHABURI PROVINCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were: 1) to study the social conflict situation among the middle class in Phetchaburi Province; 2) to develop a peace-building process to eliminate social conflicts; 3) to investigate guidelines for resolving social conflicts based on Buddhist peaceful means; and 4) to propose a model for creating civil peace to reduce social conflicts among the middle class in Phetchaburi Province. This study employed a mixed-method research design. For the qualitative approach, structured interviews were conducted for in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 10 key informants, including community leaders, middle-class citizens across 5 occupations, and Buddhist monks. For the quantitative approach, questionnaires were distributed to a sample of the middle class in Phetchaburi Province, resulting in 330 completed responses. Statistical analysis included percentage, mean, standard deviation, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
The research findings revealed that:
- The overall social conflict situation was at a moderate level. However, the dimension of power conflict was at a high level, characterized by political polarization and the dissemination of distorted information to discredit opposing factions. In the economic dimension, conflicts arose from monopolies and business operations of local capitalists and influential figures. Meanwhile, religious beliefs and the institution of the monarchy did not cause severe conflicts.
- The overall peace-building process was rated at a high level. This included the Threefold Training (focusing on morality and empathy), Good Friendliness (Kalyanamitta: active listening and gentle communication), Forgiveness (Abhayadana: emotional awareness and mindful speech), and the Virtues for Fraternal Living (Saraniyadhamma: mindful expression and recognition of human equality). Furthermore, individuals with education higher than a bachelor's degree demonstrated significantly higher behaviors in civil peace-building than other groups at a statistically significant level of 0.05.
- The overall guidelines for conflict management based on Buddhist peaceful means were at a moderate level. The highest mean score was found in the dimension of vision, collaboration, and creative out-of-the-box thinking, emphasizing sincere communication and mutual understanding among all stakeholders. Hypothesis testing indicated that males had a higher level of conflict management capability than females, and conflict management had a moderate positive correlation with civil peace-building at a statistically significant level of 0.05.
- The model for creating civil peace was overall and in all aspects rated at a high level, comprising 5 core pillars: (1) monks acting as mediators to propagate Dhamma; (2) leaders maintaining justice, integrity, and transparency; (3) village committees being honest, unbiased
Article Details
References
บุษบา สุธีธร. (2565). การสื่อสารเพื่อการจัดการความขัดแย้งเชิงสร้างสรรค์. กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งมหาวิทยาลัย.
พระครูนิรมิตสังฆกิจ และคณะ. (2565). สถานการณ์ความขัดแย้งและการมีส่วนร่วมของชนชั้นกลางในสังคมไทยร่วมสมัย. ใน รายงานวิจัย. สถาบันวิจัยพุทธศาสตร์.
ลิขิต ธีรเวคิน. (2564). วิวัฒนาการเมืองไทยกับการจัดการความขัดแย้ง. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3). กรุงเทพฯ: สำนักพิมพ์ธรรมศาสตร์.
ศ.ดร.ป๋วย อึ๊งภากรณ์. (ม.ป.ป.). แนวคิดสันติประชาธรรม: สมรรถภาพ เสรีภาพ ความยุติธรรม และความเมตตากรุณา. กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิบูรณะชนบทแห่งประเทศไทย.
ฐณบดินทร์ รัตนวิชัย. (2565). การสร้างชุมชนวิถีพุทธเพื่อความสมานฉันท์ในสังคมไทย. วารสารพุทธศาสน์ศึกษา, 29(2), 45-60.
ณรัฐ สวาสดิ์รัตน์. (2566). หลักกัลยาณมิตรกับการแก้ปัญหาความขัดแย้งในระดับท้องถิ่น. วารสารสันติศึกษาปริทรรศน์, 11(1), 112-128.
Henkin, A. B., & Other. (1999). Conflict management strategies in educational organizations. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(3), 200-215.
Well, S. (2000). Collaborative strategies for conflict resolution in diverse communities. International Journal of Social Research, 14(4), 301-318.