DEVELOPING CREATIVE WRITING ABILITIES IN THAI LANGUAGE USING A PROCESS WRITING APPROACH COMBINED WITH THE EXIT TICKET TECHNIQUE FOR SIXTH-GRADE STUDENTS IN THE PHRA LAO NETWORK, AMNAT CHAROEN PROVINCE

Main Article Content

Phatcharapha Somrak
Rapin Chuckuen
Darunee Khotchaphom

Abstract

The purposes of this research were (1) to examine the efficiency of lesson plans incorporating the Process Writing Approach and Exit Ticket technique based on the 80/80 efficiency criterion (2) to develop Thai creative writing abilities through the integration of the Process Writing Approach and Exit Ticket technique and (3) to investigate student satisfaction toward Thai language instruction utilizing these methods. The participants consisted of 20 students. The research instruments included 8 lesson plans designed to enhance Thai creative writing abilities using the Process Writing Approach and Exit Ticket technique. The data were analyzed using E1/E2 efficiency formula and dependent sample t-test.


Research Findings that:


1) The efficiency of the Thai language lesson plans for Grade 6 students, using the Process Writing Approach and Exit Ticket technique, was 80.44/86.70 which met the specified criteria.


2) The students' creative writing abilities in Thai after the intervention were significantly higher than before the intervention at the .05 level of statistical significance.


3) Overall, the Grade 6 students expressed the highest level of satisfaction toward the learning management using the Process Writing Approach and Exit Ticket technique ( ð‘ĨĖ… = 4.80, S.D. = 0.40).

Article Details

Section
Article

References

āđ€āļ—āļžāļŠāļē āļšāļēāļĢāļĄāļĩ. (2565). āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļœāļĨāļŠāļąāļĄāļĪāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļšāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ•āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ„āļ“āļīāļ•āļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđāļĒāļāļ•āļąāļ§āļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļ­āļšāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļŦāļļāļ™āļēāļĄāļ”āļĩāļāļĢāļĩāļŠāļ­āļ‡ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āđāļšāļš ACE āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļšāđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™āļīāļ„āļ•āļąāđ‹āļ§āļ­āļ­āļ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāļŠāļ§āļ™ āļŠāļļāļ™āļąāļ™āļ—āļē, (āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļžāļīāđ€āļĻāļĐ), 54–65.

āļĢāļ°āļžāļīāļ™ āļŠāļđāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ™, āļāļ­āļšāļāļļāļĨ āđƒāļˆāļ‚āļ§āļēāļ‡, āļ„āļ“āļīāļ• āļ„āļ‡āļ—āļ­āļ‡ āđāļĨāļ°āļ§āļēāļĢāļĩ āļ§āļ‡āļĻāđŒāļ‚āļļāļ™āđ€āļ“āļĢ. (2568). āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ™āļ—āļąāļĻāļ™āđŒāļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļšāđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™āļīāļ„ Exit Ticket āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āļĩāļĒāļ™āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļ™āļąāļāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ–āļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ›āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆ 6. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢ āļĄāļˆāļĢ āļžāļļāļ—āļ˜āļ›āļąāļāļāļēāļ›āļĢāļīāļ—āļĢāļĢāļĻāļ™āđŒ, 10(2), 1-14.

āļ§āļ™āļīāļ”āļē āļšāļļāļāļŠāļļāļ‚. (2564). āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļ āļēāļĐāļēāđ„āļ—āļĒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ°āļ—āđ‰āļ­āļ™āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰. āđƒāļ™ āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļ™āļīāļžāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļ›āļĢāļīāļāļāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•. āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāļĄāļŦāļēāļŠāļēāļĢāļ„āļēāļĄ.

āļ§āļĢāļĢāļ“āļ āļē āļ āļđāđāļ‚āļĄāļŦāļĄāļ­āļ. (2565). āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ—āļąāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļžāļđāļ”āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āđāļšāļšāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļĄāļ·āļ­āđ€āļ—āļ„āļ™āļīāļ„ G.I āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļšāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļąāļāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļāļēāļĻāļ™āļĩāļĒāļšāļąāļ•āļĢāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļŠāļĩāļžāļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆ 1. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļšāļąāļ™āļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāļžāļīāļĄāļĨāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄ, 9(2), 67–81.

āļŠāļ–āļēāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļī (āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļēāļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļŠāļ™). (2567). āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļŠāļ­āļšāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļŠāļēāļ•āļīāļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™ (O-NET) āļ›āļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē 2567. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļœāļđāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļ‡.

āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ›āļĨāļąāļ”āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢ. (2567). āļŠāļ–āļīāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļœāļĨāļŠāļąāļĄāļĪāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāđ€āļ‚āļ•āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢ.

āļŠāļļāļ˜āļ°āļ™āļ° āļžāļēāļĄāļ™āļ•āļĢāļĩ. (2561). āđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ—āļąāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ āļēāļĐāļēāđ„āļ—āļĒāđƒāļ™āļĻāļ•āļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐāļ—āļĩāđˆ 21. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļˆāļļāļŽāļēāļ™āļēāļ„āļĢāļ—āļĢāļĢāļĻāļ™āđŒ, 5(2), 232–247.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.

Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.