EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN SCHOOLS UNDER PATTANI PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE 1

Main Article Content

Evefanee Duldisaya
Somkiat Saithanoo
Thaweesak Putsukee
Chuanpit Chumkhong

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) study the conditions, success factors, problems, and obstacles in educational management for sustainable development of schools under Pattani Primary Educational Service Area Office 1; 2) develop guidelines for educational management for sustainable development; and 3) evaluate the guidelines in terms of propriety, feasibility, and utility. A mixed methods research design was employed, conducted in three phases. The quantitative sample comprised 358 school administrators, teachers, and basic education school board members, whose sample size was determined using Yamane's formula and selected by stratified random sampling according to school size. The 25 key informants for the qualitative phase consisted of 13 in-depth interviewees selected purposively and 12 homogeneous focus group participants. The instruments were a questionnaire (with IOC values of 0.60 or higher for every item and an overall reliability coefficient of 0.95), a semi-structured in-depth interview form, and a focus group discussion form. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, while qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis.


The findings revealed that 1) the overall condition of educational management for sustainable development of schools under Pattani Primary Educational Service Area Office 1 was at the highest level. The highest mean was found in developing the competencies of learners, teachers, and administrators, followed by driving systemic change in schools, while curriculum and learning management and community participation had equal means. Key success factors included visionary administrators, teachers with an understanding of ESD, flexible curricula, and community participation, whereas the problems and obstacles included personnel limitations, inflexible curricula, insufficient resources, and the area's specific context of cultural and religious diversity. 2) The developed guidelines comprised five dimensions: integrating social and cultural contexts; developing the competencies of learners, teachers, and administrators; developing curricula and learning management; building community collaboration; and management strategy and policy-driven implementation. 3) Evaluation by 12 experts found the guidelines appropriate, feasible, and useful in all aspects, accounting for 100 percent on every indicator.

Article Details

Section
Article

References

วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2556). การสร้างการเรียนรู้สู่ศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพมหานคร: มูลนิธิ สยามกัมมาจล.

วิโรจน์ สารรัตนะ. (2555). แนวคิด ทฤษฎี และประเด็นเพื่อการบริหารทางการศึกษา. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 8). กรุงเทพมหานคร: ทิพยวิสุทธิ์.

สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา. (2560). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560–2579. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักงานเลขาธิการสภาการศึกษา.

สำนักงานเลขานุการของคณะกรรมการยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ. (2561). ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ พ.ศ. 2561–2580. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.

อับดุลรอยะ มาหามะ. (2563). การบริหารสถานศึกษาตามแนวคิดการพัฒนาที่ยั่งยืนในโรงเรียนเอกชนสอน ศาสนาอิสลามจังหวัดชายแดนภาคใต้. วารสารอัล-ฮิกมะฮ์ มหาวิทยาลัยฟาฏอนี, 10(19), 103–124.

Barth, M., & Rieckmann, M. (2012). Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: An output perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 26, 28–36.

Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development. Sustainability, 11(3), 719.

Bertschy, F., Künzli, C., & Lehmann, M. (2013). Teachers’ competencies for the implementation of educational offers in the field of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 5(12), 5067–5080.

Blank, M. J., Melaville, A., & Shah, B. P. (2003). Making the difference: Research and practice in community schools. Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools.

Eisner, E. W. (1996). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Totnes: Green Books.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2021). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Paris: UNESCO.