LGBTQ+ INCLUSION IN THE WORKPLACE AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY IN ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the relationship between LGBTQ+ inclusion in the workplace and employee performance, proposing psychological safety as a conceptual mechanism that links the organizational environment to work-related outcomes within the framework of organizational psychology. This study is based on a synthesis of international research, reports from international organizations, and contextual evidence from Thailand. The findings indicate that support for sexual diversity in organizations—encompassing formal policies, an inclusive organizational climate, and supportive interpersonal relationships—is positively associated with work attitudes and negatively associated with psychological distress and perceived discrimination. In the Thai context, existing evidence suggests that employees with diverse sexual identities continue to face structural constraints and discrimination in the workplace. The article argues that psychological safety serves as a key mechanism in explaining the impact of LGBTQ+ inclusion on employee performance. Creating an environment that enables individuals to express themselves without fear of negative consequences can significantly enhance employee engagement and potential. Therefore, organizational development should focus on integrating equality-oriented policies with the systematic promotion of psychological safety. Such an approach can enhance employee performance and organizational sustainability in the long term, ultimately contributing to the development of equitable and competitive organizations in contemporary society.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
พระราชบัญญัติความเท่าเทียมระหว่างเพศ พ.ศ. 2558. (2558). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่ม 132ตอนที่ 18 ก หน้า 17-27 (13 มีนาคม 2558).
สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการเลือกตั้ง. (2567, 24 กันยายน). พระราชบัญญัติสมรสเท่าเทียมประกาศใช้แล้ว มีผลบังคับใช้ในปี 2568. จาก https://www.ect.go.th/th/ kamphaengphet/db_123_kamphaengphet_cms_30/46243/
Badgett, M. V. L., Nezhad, S., Waaldijk, K., & van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2014). The economic cost of stigma and the exclusion of LGBT
people: A case study of India. World Bank. Retrieved from https://documents1.
worldbank.org/curated/en/527261468035379692/pdf/940400WP0Box380usion0of0LGBT0People.pdf
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Holman, E. G., Fish, J. N., Oswald, R. F., & Goldberg, A. E. (2021). Reconsidering the LGBT climate inventory: Understanding support and hostility for LGBTQ employees in the workplace. Journal of Career Assessment.
International Labour Organization. (2014). Gender identity and sexual orientation in Thailand: Promoting rights, diversity and equality in the world of work. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/ public/@asia/@ro-bangkok/@srobangkok/documents/publication/wcms _356950.pdf
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2019). Tolerance but not inclusion: A national survey on experiences of discrimination and social attitudes towards LGBT people in Thailand. UNDP Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.aidsdatahub.org/sites/default/files/resource/undp-th-2019-lgbt-tolerance-not-inclusion.pdf
Wax, A., Coletti, K. K., & Ogaz, J. W. (2018). The benefit of full disclosure: A meta-analysis of the implications of coming out at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 8(1), 3–30.
Webster, J. R., Adams, G. A., Maranto, C. L., Sawyer, K., & Thoroughgood, C. (2018). Workplace contextual supports for LGBT employees: A review, meta-analysis, and agenda for future research. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 193–210.