ENTREPRENEURIAL SELF-EFFICACY AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE IN CHINESE TECHNOLOGY-BASED NEW VENTURES: THE MEDIATING ROLES OF ENTREPRENEURIAL MOTIVATION AND RESOURCE BRICOLAGE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This research article aims to: (1) examine whether entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) directly influences innovation performance in Chinese technology-based new ventures; (2) investigate the mediating roles of entrepreneurial motivation (EM) and resource bricolage (RB) in the relationship between ESE and innovation performance; and (3) evaluate whether organizational learning (OL) moderates the strength of this relationship. The study employed a quantitative research design, collecting survey data from 740 founders and senior executives of technology-based new ventures across 29 regions in China. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM).
The research results found that: (1) Entrepreneurial self-efficacy has a significant positive direct effect on innovation performance. (2) Entrepreneurial motivation and resource bricolage both serve as significant mediators in the relationship between ESE and innovation performance, indicating complementary mediation mechanisms. (3) Organizational learning significantly moderates the relationship between ESE and innovation performance, such that the positive effect of ESE is stronger under high levels of organizational learning.
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Fischer, M. M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The annals of regional science, 35, 199-216.
Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?. Psychological bulletin, 112(2), 351.
Jerez-Gomez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005). Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of business research, 58(6), 715-725.
McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self–efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 33(4), 965-988.
Ng, T. W., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social–cognitive theory perspective. Journal of applied psycholog y, 101(1), 14.
Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research policy, 31(7), 1053-1067.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource‐constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230.
Urban, B., & Wood, E. (2017). The innovating firm as corporate entrepreneurship. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(4), 534-556.
Usman, O., & Nabilla, T. (2020). The Effect of Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Independence to the Entrepreneurial Intention. Motivation, and Independence to the Entrepreneurial Intention (June 28, 2020).
Vijaya, V., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (1998). A scale to assess entrepreneurial motivation. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 183-198.
Wang, Y. L., & Ellinger, A. D. (2008). Organizational Learning and Innovation Performance: A Review of the Literature and the Development of a Conceptual Framework and Research Hypotheses. Online Submission.
Yuan, Y. H. (2022). A Study From a Psychological Perspective of High Performance to Explore the Relationship Among Resource Bricolage, Social Capital, Entrepreneurial Attitude, and Intention. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 944151.
