DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING MOTIVATION AT ‎PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN ZHENGZHOU, CHINA

Main Article Content

Kunzhan Li
Ping Xu

บทคัดย่อ

This study examines how active learning approaches influence student learning motivation in private universities in Zhengzhou, China, pursuing five objectives: (1) to assess students’ perceptions of active learning approaches; (2) to assess students’ learning attitude, learning intention, and learning motivation; (3) to examine the relationships among active learning, learning attitude, learning intention, and learning motivation; (4) to develop a motivational enhancement model; and (5) to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and Achievement Goal Theory, the study adopts a mixed-methods design combining questionnaire surveys and intervention experiments. Quantitative data were collected from 558 undergraduate students across three private universities in Zhengzhou, China, and analysed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, structural equation modelling, and paired-sample t-tests.


Five findings emerge. First, students reported high levels of active learning participation (M = 4.12). Second, learning attitude (M = 4.08), learning intention (M = 4.15), and learning motivation (M = 4.10) were all high. Third, active learning significantly influenced learning attitude (β = 0.71, p < 0.001) and learning intention (β = 0.64, p < 0.001), while learning intention significantly affected learning motivation (β = 0.69, p < 0.001). Fourth, the Active Learning–Attitude–Intention Motivational Enhancement Model (AAI-MEM) was successfully developed. Fifth, post-test motivation scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores after the eight-week intervention (t = 8.47, p < 0.001). The study contributes new knowledge by integrating TPB and AGT into a unified motivational framework for student-centered learning.

Article Details

ประเภทบทความ
บทความ

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Cheng, X. (2023). Looking through goal theories in language learning: A review on goal setting and achievement goal theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1035223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035223

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1319030111

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0019682

Jeno, L. M. (2015). Encouraging active learning in higher education: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 26(2), 13–29.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1017

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.216898 30.2004.tb00809.x

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/ 10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052 004025

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4102_2