THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL LEADERSHIP MODEL FOR PRIVATE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN CHONGQING, CHINA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The objectives of this research were 1) to examine the five dimensions of leadership among private school administrators in Chongqing, China, 2) to develop a comprehensive multi-dimensional leadership model, and 3) to evaluate the feasibility and practical application of the model. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating both qualitative and quantitative data. The conceptual framework was adapted from the leadership model proposed by Campbell and Sammie. The target group comprised 30 private school administrators in Chongqing. The research was conducted in 3 steps as follows: Step 1: Studying five dimensions of leadership for school administrators. Step 2: Creating a multi-dimensional leadership model. Step 3: Evaluating the feasibility and utilization of the multi-dimensional leadership model. Data were collected using a questionnaire and in-depth interviews, and were analyzed using descriptive statistics including percentage, mean, and standard deviation.
The research results revealed that 1) the multi-dimensional leadership of school administrators consisted of five aspects: having a vision, personnel participation, building relationships with personnel, coaching and monitoring and the results of the confirmatory factor analysis of the multi-dimensional leadership of school administrators.2) The multi-dimensional leadership model of school administrators was appropriate and accurate, consisted of 5 aspects: having a vision with 10 items, personnel participation with 7 items, building relationships with personnel with 10 items, coaching with 12 items, and monitoring with 9 items, totally 48 items. 3)The results of the evaluation of the feasibility and utilization of the multi-dimensional leadership model of school administrators indicated that the feasibility was at a high level. When considering individual aspects in descending order of means as follows: having the vision, building relationships with personnel, having personnel participation, coaching, and monitoring.
Article Details
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bird, A. (2022). Cross-cultural leadership in the age of globalization. Journal of Global China Justice Observer. (2021, September 10).
Implementing regulations on the private education promotion law of China (2021). Retrieved from https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com Educational Leadership, 29(4), 80–96.
Farh, J.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–127). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gilliam, T., & Monahan, J. (2021). Coaching for performance in educational
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351.
HKTDC Research. (2022, May 24). Chengdu–Chongqing economic circle: Objectives and planning rationale. Hong Kong Trade Development Council. Retrieved from https://research.hktdc.com institutions. Education Management Review, 19(1), 1–8. institutions. Journal of Contemporary Educational Management, 22(3), 9–24.
Kaewseng, M. (2019). Strategic thinking components for school administrators in
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mojsovski, K. (2021). Monitoring as a management tool in education: A case of Balkan organizations. Springer.
Ozturgut, O. (2011). Quality assurance in private higher education in China. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1–10.
Paengthai, S. (2019). Components of creative leadership of school administrators
Passmore, J. (2020). The leader’s guide to coaching in schools. Routledge. private schools. Journal of Educational Innovation and Policy, 12(1), 1–13.
Ruan, J., Liu, Y., & Wang, Q. (2024). University managers or institutional leaders? A study on leadership roles in Chinese higher education. Higher Education, 87(4), 755–771. southern Andaman provinces. Journal of Educational Administration, 15(3), 48–66.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sricharin, S. (2024). Catholic identity and leadership transformation: A case study in State Council of China. (2025, January 19). China unveils plan to build a strong education nation by 2035. Xinhua/Reuters.
Stevens, R. (2021). Visionary leadership and motivational behavior in educational
study. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 27(2), 556–573.
Taylor, C. M. (2020). Visionary leadership and organizational outcomes: An empirical through policy-based monitoring. Thai Educational Review, 10(1), 55–70. under the Primary Educational Service Area Office 2, Khon Kaen. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 14(4), 3299–3315.
Wilayalai, K. (2024). Monitoring practices of educational administrators: Toward adaptive management. Journal of Policy Research in Education, 11(2), 45–63.
Witthaya, K. (2023). Enhancing professionalism among Thai school administrators
Wu, M., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2023). Research on the governance structure of private universities in China: Problems and countermeasures. Frontiers in Education, 8, 113–127.
